Radical Simplification - Not That Simple!
In the previous post I proved an identity in radicals:
![\sqrt[3]{18+\sqrt{325}}+\sqrt[3]{18-\sqrt{325}}=3](http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/latex/cache/tex_37572c618280da58681827545da15bd6.gif)
which followed the method used in another post where another identity in radicals
![\sqrt[3]{2 + \sqrt{5}} + \sqrt[3]{2 - \sqrt{5}} = 1.](http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/latex/cache/tex_45c065f99c911715cc36ecd95f969de1.gif)
has been derived. The latter post pointed to an earlier and perhaps a more exciting one where we established an unexpected identity
![\displaystyle\sqrt[3]{2 \pm \sqrt{5}} = \frac{1 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2}.](http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/latex/cache/tex_11f8e0814aec3b3496b16d009fd7e9d7.gif)
This was verified by simply taking the cube of the two sides of the equation. In a private correspondence related to the previous post Bruce Reznick suggested a different way of showing that
![\sqrt[3]{18+\sqrt{325}}=\sqrt[3]{18 \pm 5 \sqrt{13}}=a+b\sqrt{13},](http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/latex/cache/tex_364e0cc2ef88bcdc342c1e9d88e3f94d.gif)
with rational
and
In Bruce Reznick's words:
So we look for
that is,
and
Hard to solve directly, but we can multiply the first by
and subtract
times the second to get
![]()
which your friendly computer algebra system (otherwise useless) will tell you equals
If
then
and
so
and
and
Same with "
". This method works quite generally.
And would not it? With the prior knowledge that
the latter result seems not that surprising, one can think. Bruce continues to show with another example that expectations can be easily shuttered in mathematics.
Again, our previous experience may suggest the existence of rational
and
such that

If we proceed as before, but now squaring both sides of the equation, and equating rational and irrational components, we get
and
so

If
then
so
This is not what we expected, but is at least true:

What about the other factor? If
then
so
and
This gives

Strangely, this reduces to exactly the result due to the first (and different) factor:

In terms of quadratic fields,
, what we found may be expressed formally as
but
which, perhaps, helps enhance intuition of what goes on in Bruce's example but also adds to the mystery of
or ![\sqrt[3]{2 + \sqrt{5}}\in\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{5}].](http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/latex/cache/tex_1dc9d0f37eb64f8d6fa2dc8b168e6361.gif)











![\displaystyle\sqrt[3]{18 + 5 \sqrt{13}} = \frac{3}{2} + \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{13}.](http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/latex/cache/tex_ac18a356badb2f374431cb75bfa26522.gif)

![\sqrt[3]{2 \pm \sqrt{5}} = \frac{1 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2}.](http://www.mathteacherctk.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/latex/cache/tex_2f49e125b717cd174c141ed08e59f4b1.gif)

I like the helpful info you supply in your articles.
May 5th, 2015 at 7:45 amI'll bookmark your weblog and test once more right here regularly.
I am relatively sure I'll be told lots of new stuff proper right here!
Good luck for the following!
It's actually a nice and useful piece of info.
I'm glad that you simply shared this useful info with us.
September 17th, 2015 at 4:07 amPlease stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.